A Count Invariant for Lambek Calculus with Additives and Bracket Modalities
نویسندگان
چکیده
The count invariance of van Benthem (1991[16]) is that for a sequent to be a theorem of the Lambek calculus, for each atom, the number of positive occurrences equals the number of negative occurrences. (The same is true for multiplicative linear logic.) The count invariance provides for extensive pruning of the sequent proof search space. In this paper we generalize count invariance to categorial grammar (or linear logic) with additives and bracket modalities. We define by mutual recursion two counts, minimum count and maximum count, and we prove that if a multiplicative-additive sequent is a theorem, then for every atom, the minimum count is less than or equal to zero and the maximum count is greater than or equal to zero; in the case of a purely multiplicative sequent, minimum count and maximum count coincide in such a way as to together reconstitute the van Benthem count criterion. We then define in the same way a bracket count providing a count check for bracket modalities. This allows for efficient pruning of the sequent proof search space in parsing categorial grammar with additives and bracket modalities.
منابع مشابه
A Polynomial-Time Algorithm for the Lambek Calculus with Brackets of Bounded Order
Lambek calculus is a logical foundation of categorial grammar, a linguistic paradigm of grammar as logic and parsing as deduction. Pentus (2010) gave a polynomial-time algorithm for determining provability of bounded depth formulas in L∗, the Lambek calculus with empty antecedents allowed. Pentus’ algorithm is based on tabularisation of proof nets. Lambek calculus with brackets is a conservativ...
متن کاملOn Calculus of Displacement
The calculus of Lambek (1958) did not make much impact until the 1980s, but for more than twenty years now it has constituted the foundation of type logical categorial grammar. It has occupied such a central position because of its good logical properties, but it has also been clear, even from the start of its renaissance, that the Lambek calculus suffers from fundamental shortcomings, which we...
متن کاملUndecidability of the Lambek Calculus with Subexponential and Bracket Modalities
Morrill and Valent́ın in the paper “Computational coverage of TLG: Nonlinearity” considered two extensions of the Lambek calculus with socalled “exponential” modalities. These calculi serve as a basis for describing fragments of natural language via categorial grammars. In this paper we show undecidability of derivability problems in these two calculi. On the other hand, restricted fragments of ...
متن کاملCount-Invariance Including Exponentials
We define infinitary count-invariance for categorial logic, extending countinvariance for multiplicatives (van Benthem, 1991) and additives and bracket modalities (Valentı́n et al., 2013) to include exponentials. This provides an e↵ective tool for pruning proof search in categorial parsing/theorem-proving.
متن کاملFull Nonassociative Lambek Calculus with Distribution: Models and Grammars
We study Nonassociative Lambek Calculus with additives ∧,∨, satisfying the distributive law (Full Nonassociative Lambek Calculus with Distribution DFNL). We prove that formal grammars based on DFNL, also with assumptions, generate context-free languages. The proof uses proof-theoretic tools (interpolation) and a construction of a finite model, employed in [13] in the proof of Strong Finite Mode...
متن کامل